Construction optimizations, material substitutions and risk observations. The project stated that any proposed changes were subject to the buyer's written approval.
Price was not the same as a technical sign-off
The commercial reply came first. A separate manufacturability review followed because a quantity or freight answer does not settle construction, material choice or production risk.
What came back from the review
| Review area | How it appeared in the project |
|---|---|
| Construction | Possible construction optimizations. |
| Material | Possible material substitutions. |
| Risk | Risk observations to be returned to the buyer. |
The factory was not given a blank cheque to change the design
None of those comments automatically changed the cap. The buyer still had to approve a proposed construction or material change in writing before it became part of the working specification.
Record note: customer identity, pricing and other private commercial details are omitted.
Related development notes
Send the details that could change the sample
A useful review starts with the cap reference and the details you want to change. Mark which parts are essential and which are open to suggestions. That lets us ask about a difficult detail without quietly replacing it.
- Show the front, side and back shape. Include measurements if fit or brim length matters.
- Attach the logo file with its intended size and position. Separate front embroidery from side or rear decoration.
- Name the fabric, closure and inside trims you need. Flag any material or testing requirement.
- Give the quantity by colour, the destination and the date the caps are needed.
If a detail needs changing, keep the original requirement, proposed revision and your approval together. For a collection with several colours, see this three-colour trucker reference.